49
Trust
Score
WattBot

Blue Raven Solar reviews

NATIONAL
Blue Raven Solar
18,486 Reviews • 51 Locations 2,458,638 Data Points Processed

Loading map...

The Verdict

Blue Raven Solar is not worth your time or money. We analyzed thousands of reviews and found a company whose operations have collapsed under its own growth, leaving customers stranded with damaged roofs, faulty panels, and support teams that ghost them for months. One homeowner came home to a solar panel sitting in their backyard with no explanation, then spent a year chasing Blue Raven to fix it. Another discovered their installation crew brought the wrong design and had to repair roof damage the team caused. The post-sale breakdowns are systematic: wrong-sized critter guards delivered twice before work orders get canceled, refund requests ignored for months while contractors show up unannounced, consumption meters installed incorrectly and left broken. When squirrels chewed through wiring because Blue Raven botched the critter guard install, the company wanted to charge the homeowner $350 just to move a panel so roof shingles could be repaired. Communication is so bad that one reviewer saved Blue Raven's number as a phone contact because calling daily was the only way to get updates the company promised but never delivered.

If you're considering Blue Raven, walk away. The installation crews may be polite, but the company's support infrastructure is a dumpster fire. You'll end up paying for their mistakes and spending months chasing ghosts for answers.

3 Stories That Stood Out

1. Emily Albertson
Google | Oct 25, 2025 |

Emily Albertson bought a house that already had a Blue Raven Solar system, and when a module failed in October 2024 she reached back to the original installer expecting a warranty fix. A year and roughly $1,500 later, she still wrestled with a broken panel and a critter guard that was only partially installed. Communication collapsed so badly that she added Blue Raven as a phone contact because she found herself calling constantly for basic updates they never volunteered even after repeated promises. Repairs kept slipping. One day she came home to find a panel sitting in her backyard with no explanation; it took a week of calls to learn when—or if—the replacement would be reinstalled. After the panel work finally moved forward, she bought critter guard in February because squirrels had chewed wiring. Blue Raven turned up with the wrong size twice, canceled work orders repeatedly, and stretched the timeline so long that squirrels chewed through another module and left scratches on roof shingles. They charged $350 to move a panel so she could get the shingles repaired, then canceled the contractor the day before the visit and left her chasing an ETA for more than a month. When she,

2. Ashish Upadhyay
Google | May 22, 2023 |

In March 2024 Ashish Upadhyay went through a retrofit with Blue Raven that started out smooth but unraveled during the design and installation phases. He discovered the crew had been working from the wrong design, which forced repairs to the roof afterward. The installation team left nails, drill bits and staples scattered around the yard and attic; his 5-year-old actually found a nail, and a 1-year-old picked up a loose screw on the carpet before the family noticed. He waited more than three weeks to get anyone on the phone about these grievances, then watched the person assigned to him stop responding. A consumption meter was installed incorrectly, took months to correct, and months later—by December 2024—he was still trying to reach a senior contact after repeated promises from customer support that never materialized. Blue Raven eventually reached out, sent a crew to clean up, and called him, but the follow-up cleanup proved incomplete: leftover packaging on the roof and attic staples remained, so he downgraded his view. Amid the problems, Jay and his crew stood out — professional, friendly, and communicative before and after their portion of the installation. The detail that l

3. Tom Kabis
Google | Oct 23, 2024 |

Tom began with hope: Blue Raven moved forward, and the array they finally mounted in Colorado Springs used integrated micro-inverters — the kind of plug-and-play setup a homeowner likes to see. But the project turned into a saga of repeated delays and redesigns, many of which Blue Raven blamed on Colorado Springs Utilities. What ended up on the roof was technically sound, yet the whole process stretched to more than a year and the finished system fell short of the originally requested output and layout. After letting a year pass, he asked Blue Raven to add just two panels to complete the initial design. Instead of a quick visit, the company insisted on a full design review and demanded a year’s worth of power bills before entertaining the change. That request struck him as unnecessary for two extra modules. He also learned the company had been acquired by SunPower and shifted its pay model to a 100% commission structure — a change that, in his view, warped sales incentives. A salesperson, Adriana, arranged a Skype-style meeting and pushed hard for far more equipment: seven additional panels, placed on east, west and even north-facing roof slopes. She offered a string of reasons —

Platforms Monitored

Google
11935 Reviews · 43 Locations
4.3/5
Yelp
2015 Reviews · 40 Locations
2.7/5
SolarReviews
1992 Reviews · 1 Location
4.5/5
BBB
1446 Reviews · 14 Locations
3.7/5
EnergySage
1098 Reviews · 2 Locations
4.4/5

Performance by Work Type

SOLAR
SOLAR
Installation, permitting, and grid connection.
3.7/5
SERVICE
SERVICE
Repairs, maintenance, and ongoing system support.
2.1/5
ROOFING
ROOFING
Repair or replacement, before or after solar installation.
2.7/5
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL
Panel upgrades and wiring for system readiness.
3.5/5
BATTERY
BATTERY
Energy storage for backup savings and independence.
2.6/5
COMPLEX PROJECTS
COMPLEX PROJECTS
Multi-trade installations requiring co-ordination.
2.7/5

How We Got To Trust Score 49

Buyer Beware

Unauthorized Activities

16 reports

We checked for:
Unauthorized charges
Undisclosed loans
Identity theft
Forged signatures
Fake contracts
Falsified permits

Misleading Claims

111 reports

We checked for:
Bait & switch
Overstated savings
Hidden fees
Misrepresented specs
False performance
Misleading warranty

Background Check

Serving customers for 15 years

Among the longest-standing installers in the market.

BBB Rating: D-

Poor BBB standing. Significant complaints.

Natural Review Patterns

Reviews were posted naturally over time.

What You Can Expect

01

1. David Nahmias
Google | Oct 1, 2025 |

David Nahmias reached his three-year mark with a 30-panel rooftop system and discovered the array had logged about 51,000 kWh of production—roughly $7,200 in avoided electric costs—according to the mobile app. He realized that with AES continuing to raise rates, the system’s payback will arrive sooner than he first calculated. He hit a minor snag when one microinverter stopped responding, but his sales consultant, Dave, arranged a technician visit and the repair was handled under warranty. Beyond the numbers, what stands out is the ongoing personal touch: Dave still drops by when he’s in the neighborhood, and Nahmias looks forward to many more years of clean energy and lower bills.

2. Garrett Wozniak
Google | Aug 9, 2025 |

Garrett’s solar project started off on a high note: the sales process and original installation, which happened about three years ago, were smooth enough to feel stellar. The trouble came later, when a needed service repair turned into a drawn-out ordeal that stretched from the first call in March until the work was finally wrapped in late July. What should have been a straightforward fix dragged on for four months, with appointments scheduled weeks apart, communication that felt reactive instead of proactive, and calls in for updates that seemed to lead nowhere. The technicians who came out would finish their visit and leave without giving him much of a status update, so he kept having to follow up himself to find out what was happening. The biggest gap seemed to be in the company’s coordination: the call center didn’t appear to have enough access to case details to answer basic questions, leaving him stuck waiting on repairs and chasing information after each visit.

3. pawalsh610
EnergySage | Mar 18, 2026 |

Pawalsh610’s experience turned into a long, frustrating add-on project around an Enphase solar setup Blue Raven had installed about six years earlier, after SunPower later took over the company. Last year he bought backup batteries, expecting a straightforward upgrade, but the installation dragged on for three weeks and then sat for more than three months before the system could actually operate. Instead of the battery backup he had paid for, he ended up without his solar for roughly four months, with the utility and the installer trading blame while the paperwork and approvals lagged behind. He spent too much time chasing updates that should have come automatically, and the lack of detail in the project planning appeared to leave materials and crew timing out of sync. Even the people he dealt with were friendly, but they seemed trapped without reliable answers from the different departments. When the system was finally close to being approved, an invoice for final payment arrived days after the install, as if the job were already wrapped up, which only added to the feeling that they were ready to move on before his system was back online.

02

1. Christopher Burgess
Google | Feb 17, 2026 |

Christopher had Blue Raven, now SunPower, install solar panels on his home in March 2023, and the job unfolded without headaches. The crew handled the installation professionally, and once the system was up, it worked so well that it covered nearly all of the household’s electricity. With the panels performing flawlessly through the months that followed, he ended up with a setup that quietly did exactly what it was meant to do.

2. Melissa
Google | Aug 26, 2025 |

Melissa had solar panels installed on her home and the crew’s work looked solid, but the deal around payments and disclosures fell apart. She chose the company because they promised “no payments for two years,” only to learn later that customers technically have loan payments but would be reimbursed monthly. That reimbursement arrived reliably during the first year, then in the second year she received just four monthly checks. With the two‑year mark approaching next month, multiple calls produced nothing more than “we’re working on it,” and she kept running into silence and poor follow‑up. Beyond the money issue, she discovered after the first outage that the system needed an additional battery (at extra cost) to keep the lights on — the company hadn’t mentioned that requirement up front. She also learned belatedly that the tax credit would be split across two tax years rather than all at once. In short: the installation itself went well, but she felt misled by the company’s promises, their communication, and their lack of transparency. Her takeaway for buyers: get the reimbursement schedule, backup‑battery requirements, and tax‑credit timing in writing before you sign.

3. Anna O.
Yelp | Mar 5, 2026 |

Anna and her family moved into a new 2024 home that came with a SunPower solar setup, and for a few months it seemed fine. Then, starting in late 2024, the system stopped producing power and never really recovered. What followed was a slow, frustrating pattern: each service visit took months to schedule, communication between appointments broke down, and every new technician seemed to begin the diagnosis from zero. Over time, the crew replaced the microinverters three separate times, including faulty units, and swapped out the monitoring equipment twice, with a third replacement looming. Anna kept having to chase updates, push for the next appointment, and listen to promises that the case was being escalated, only to see the delays stretch on. By the time mid-2026 was approaching, the solar array had been down for nearly two years, an especially bitter problem in a neighborhood where no other homes were dealing with the same kind of failure. The bright spot was the field technicians, who stayed professional and courteous even while they seemed boxed in by the company’s internal process. What stood out most was a system that spent more time in repair cycles than on the roof, with no

03

1. Marc M.
Yelp | Aug 5, 2025 |

Marc M. moved into a new-build home that already had solar panels and a SunPower monitoring device; after about two years that device needed maintenance. Blue Raven Solar / Complete Solar scheduled a replacement with an Enphase unit and assigned technicians Anthony Mendoza and Leroy to do the work. They arrived later than the original 8–10 a.m. window—closer to noon—after fitting in a few earlier appointments, which explained the delay. Once on site they swapped the device and finished the install in roughly an hour to an hour and a half. They set up the Enphase app on his phone, walked him through how to use it, and confirmed the system was operating correctly before they left. The standout detail: a fast, clean swap plus a hands-on app walkthrough so Marc left knowing how to monitor the system. The only hitch was the morning arrival window slipping into midday, so buyers should plan for that possibility even if the installation itself is brisk and thorough.

2. Jarmila Moscove
Google | Jul 15, 2025 |

Two years ago Jarmila Moscove hired Blue Raven to install solar panels on her home; the planning and installation moved smoothly and without surprises. Since then the system has worked perfectly — she hasn’t paid for electricity aside from a roughly $15 monthly PGE service charge. She converted all her appliances to electric and eliminated her gas bill entirely, and because of that outcome she recommends Blue Raven. The takeaway that sticks: her only regular utility outlay now is that about $15-a-month service fee.

3. Anita Oliver
Google | Feb 26, 2026 |

Anita’s experience with Blue Raven, now SunPower, began on a rainy installation day that left the crew waiting outside for a lead while the neighbors watched the scene unfold. What followed was even harder to ignore: after the panels went up and an inspection supposedly cleared everything, leaks started showing up in the bedroom and bathroom, and the roof damage kept getting worse instead of settling down. Over the three years since the install, the promises around getting it handled never matched the reality in the house, and the family ended up living with a roof they no longer trusted.

Long-term Satisfaction

Long-term satisfaction for Blue Raven Solar drops to 2.4 ★ compared to early reviews. This decline is worse than 75% of installers we looked at.

Long-term reviews carry the most weight in our methodology because they are most representative of what you should be paying for: a system that will perform for years.

Top Solar Installers Nationwide