Multitaskr reviews
• last updated FEB 26, 2026Loading map...
The Verdict
Multitaskr has effectively shut down, leaving dozens of families holding six-figure debts for unbuilt ADUs. We found customer after customer telling the same story: they secured loans through Sunlight Financial or Mosaic, the lender disbursed the full amount to Multitaskr, and then the company stopped answering calls and emails. One Oceanside family paid $130,000 upfront in December 2022 after being promised zero-interest financing and a 5% discount, waited two years watching start dates get pushed back indefinitely, and ended up refinancing their home to avoid exorbitant loan interest, raising their mortgage from $2,280 to $3,960 per month. Another homeowner paid nearly $170,000 across two loans in September 2023 and never saw construction begin. Reviews mention the company filing for bankruptcy, closing its office, and staff who previously managed projects now unreachable. Multiple reviewers are pursuing arbitration or lawsuits, and some warn that former employees are operating under a new company name. The few positive reviews date from 2020 to early 2023, before the company collapsed, and describe completed ADUs or battery installations that took far longer than promised but eventually finished. By mid-2024, the pattern is uniform: money collected, project abandoned, company vanished.
If you're researching Multitaskr for an ADU or battery project, walk away. The company has stopped responding to customers, left unfinished projects across Southern California, and appears to be filing for bankruptcy while clients hold loan debts approaching $200,000. Even if you find a lower quote elsewhere, you won't lose six figures to a contractor who ghosts you.
Reviews That Shaped Our Verdict
Faustina Ulugalu handed the company $77,000 two years ago to build an accessory dwelling unit on her property; after 24 months the only visible progress are spray‑painted markers indicating where the ADU was supposed to go. Two months ago the crew came back asking for another $51,000 to begin work — a demand she says came even though the company lacked the funds to complete her project. She ended up out $130,000 in total and accuses Sebastian, Fredricko and Fausto (the CEO) of giving her the runaround and scamming her. Now she’s moving this dispute into the legal system; the detail that will stick with buyers is simple and sharp: large upfront payments, years of delay, then requests for even more money while no construction ever occurred beyond site markings.
Ashley O. lives in Oceanside, CA, in a crowded multigenerational household — four children (three autistic), an 8‑month‑old, her parents, and a brother with severe schizophrenia — and hired Multitaskr to build an ADU so her brother could live separately. She found the company on Facebook around October 2022; Multitaskr promised 0% financing for 12 months and completion within that year, arranged loans through Sunlight Financial and Mosaic totaling $75,000 and $58,084.43, and offered a 5% discount if she paid everything up front. She paid in full in December 2022. Construction never began. Every inquiry pushed the start date further back, permitting dragged on far longer than expected, and a permit cost that was supposed to be covered by the loan ended up coming out of her pocket. Two years later the ADU remains unbuilt, Multitaskr has shut down and is reportedly facing bankruptcy, and she is left buried in debt with no practical recourse. To avoid steep interest charges she was forced to refinance the house before the 12‑month window closed, which bumped her mortgage from $2,280 to $3,960 per month (since February) — a payment she cannot afford. The personal toll has been,,
Cristy M. found Multitaskr on Facebook in September 2023 after they promised to build an ADU on her property with zero financing for 12 months. She handed the project over to account reps Jumar Wynn, then David Bringas, and then Carolina Vizcarra, and the company arranged two loans through Sunlight Financial and Mosaic — $100,000 and $67,000 — which were disbursed to Multitaskr as soon as she signed, even though construction hadn’t begun. Over the following months the communications dried up: calls and emails went unanswered, project updates stopped, and by August 2024 the company had effectively vanished while she remained on the hook for nearly $170,000 in loan repayments. She asked Patricio Amaya, whom she calls the operation’s lead, to show completed or in-progress ADUs so she and her husband could inspect build quality, but he repeatedly evaded those requests. Cristy flags other names tied to the operation — Jared Hamiter, Arturo Osuna, and Federico Tello — and warns the group may be doing business under different company names. She’s reached out to others who complained on Yelp and plans to contact Diefenbach Law Group to coordinate next steps; the clearest takeaway is stark:
Platforms Monitored
Performance by Work Type
How We Got To Trust Score 26
Clean Record
Unauthorized Activities
Passed screening
Misleading Claims
Passed screening
Background Check
Serving customers for 6 years
BBB Rating
Not BBB rated.
Natural Review Patterns
Reviews were posted naturally over time.
Contractor License
License information could not be confirmed.
What You Can Expect
Greg B. signed up for a home battery installation that had been fully covered by an approved SGIP grant. The company partnered with another firm and took over his project, repeatedly promising they were ready to move forward. Instead, the job dragged on for more than two years with no progress, and the company eventually went silent—stopping responses to his calls and emails. He ended up with no installation and an approved grant that never turned into a completed system, and he concluded the company deserved a zero rating. The detail that will stick with buyers: two years of repeated assurances evaporated into no work and no communication.
Brian S. signed up for a home solar battery project and ended up spending more than a year waiting with no progress. He discovered the company had told him they’d submitted plans when in fact they hadn’t. Phone calls and emails went unanswered for long stretches, and when he threatened to hire another contractor the firm sent a new rep who promised everything was under control and the job would be done in a month. That new contact then stopped responding as well. The clearest takeaway: the company misrepresented permit/plan submission and repeatedly disappeared, leaving him a year into a project with nothing completed.
Sean hired Multitaskr more than two years ago to build two ADUs and several other projects for his home, handing over $400,000 up front. The company took the money and never broke ground — the planned work never moved beyond paper. He alleges Multitaskr left numerous other families in the same position and calls for criminal consequences for Joe Frausto and Federico Tello. The lasting detail: after two years and a full up-front payment, Sean ended up with no construction and a $400,000 loss.