60
Trust
Score
WattBot

RGS Energy reviews

NATIONAL
RGS Energy
147 Reviews • 2 Locations 19,551 Data Points Processed

Loading map...

The Verdict

RGS Energy appears to be a company in collapse. We analyzed over a hundred reviews and found a disturbing split between older installations that went smoothly and recent ones that never got turned on. One couple in Colorado paid almost ten thousand dollars for panels that sat inactive for a full year because RGS repeatedly failed to submit paperwork to the utility. Another homeowner spent thirty-five thousand dollars on a monitoring system that never worked from day one and discovered RGS installed a critical component into the wrong type of outlet despite manufacturer warnings against it. When he asked the company to replace the defective part, they told him to buy a new one himself for four hundred dollars. These aren't edge cases. Reviews consistently describe a company that stops responding after install, fires key staff mid-project, bills customers five thousand dollars months after work is complete, and charges hourly fees to finish installations they botched the first time. The gap between what older reviews describe (timely crews, helpful reps, systems that work) and what recent customers report (ignored calls, missing components, threats to pull out of escrow) suggests the company fundamentally changed how it operates.

If you're already locked into a contract with RGS, document every interaction and keep your financing company in the loop. If you're still shopping, the recent pattern of non-activation and abandoned customers makes this too risky.

3 Stories That Stood Out

1. Alex K
SolarReviews | Aug 21, 2017 |

Alex K bought a brand-new house a year ago that came with the company's solar panels, paying $9,300 for the system. A year later they discovered the panels still aren't working. At first the installer came back with excuses and promised to address the problem, but over time the company stopped answering their calls and became unresponsive. The striking takeaway is simple and concrete: $9,300 paid for a nonfunctional solar setup and a year of silence from the installer.

2. Randy Ramos
Google | Oct 16, 2017 |

Randy invested about $35,000 cash to put a 33-panel solar system with individual micro-inverters on one of his ranch-style homes, paying extra so he could monitor each panel’s production online. He expected per-panel monitoring but the micro-inverter system never worked, and he spent several years being bounced around—transferred or referred inside the company, left with unanswered calls and emails, and given repeated delays while RGS claimed it had to “follow up” with others. Eventually he learned the monitoring “brain,” the Envoy, was defective from the start and had been installed into a GFI-protected outlet—a practice the Envoy documentation warns against. Customer support representative Jeannette Berry delivered RGS Energy’s final stance: they would not replace the defective Envoy, and he would have to buy a replacement from the Envoy maker for nearly $400 because the problem fell outside a two-year warranty arrangement. RGS also denied that their installers’ use of a GFI outlet caused the damage, despite the warnings in the Envoy materials. Frustrated, he plans to file a complaint with the BBB and pursue the matter in civil court. The detail that sticks: after paying $35,000,

3. groush
SolarReviews | Mar 14, 2015 |

groush shopped three local solar contractors and picked RGS for a full-rooftop system because the salesman came across as honest and kept assuring them RGS was a dependable, long-established partner in an industry of upstarts. They believed those assurances — until the salesperson was let go because the company stopped allowing part-time employees, and everything began to unravel. The crew finished the install on October 14 and the array mostly works, but the promised customer support never materialized. RGS had guaranteed one year of 24-hour monitoring so the homeowner could learn the system, yet nobody walked them through the software. When the system went dark for a couple of days, the homeowner discovered a popped controller breaker only by chance while showing the monitoring app to a friend; RGS didn’t call, and no alert came from the monitoring service. Early on the salesman pushed an upgraded controller that would monitor individual panels — not standard, the homeowner was told — so they bought it. After installation the per-panel view didn’t work until RGS agreed to supply extra software at the company’s expense. That software, however, revealed a concerning fact: some屋

Platforms Monitored

SolarReviews
139 Reviews · 1 Location
4.1/5
Google
7 Reviews · 4 Locations
2.2/5
EnergySage
1 Reviews · 2 Locations
5.0/5
Yelp
Tracking
N/A
BBB
Tracking
N/A

Performance by Work Type

SOLAR
SOLAR
Installation, permitting, and grid connection.
4.1/5
SERVICE
SERVICE
Repairs, maintenance, and ongoing system support.
2.3/5
ROOFING
ROOFING
Repair or replacement, before or after solar installation.
3.9/5
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL
Panel upgrades and wiring for system readiness.
N/A
BATTERY
BATTERY
Energy storage for backup savings and independence.
N/A
COMPLEX PROJECTS
COMPLEX PROJECTS
Multi-trade installations requiring co-ordination.
N/A

How We Got To Trust Score 60

No Red Flags

Unauthorized Activities

Passed screening

We checked for:
Unauthorized charges
Undisclosed loans
Identity theft
Forged signatures
Fake contracts
Falsified permits

Misleading Claims

Passed screening

We checked for:
Bait & switch
Overstated savings
Hidden fees
Misrepresented specs
False performance
Misleading warranty

Background Check

Serving customers for 23 years

Among the longest-standing installers in the market.

BBB Rating

Not BBB rated.

Natural Review Patterns

Reviews were posted naturally over time.

What You Can Expect

01

1. Board Member & Trustee
SolarReviews | May 27, 2016 |

This homeowner represented an 8-unit condominium that used to carry a shared $4,500 annual electrical bill tied to its electric hot-water system. After hiring Andrew Wright at RGS Energy to install solar, they discovered that, over the past year, the panels have covered the building’s electricity needs and started producing surplus credits. Those credits are now being funneled to offset the common electrical meter — roughly $50 a month — and the project has produced enough value that state and federal tax incentives plus SREC income have turned the installation into a net financial benefit after just one year. The board watched every projection Andrew laid out—guaranteed production, SREC payments, tax credits and system performance—materialize as promised. With the next utility reading on June 5th, they expect the overproduction to continue. The memorable takeaway: within a year the SRECs and credits began paying for the system, making this a compelling example for any condo board considering solar, and they recommend working with Andrew Wright at RGS Energy.

2. Greendoc
SolarReviews | Dec 13, 2015 |

Greendoc had a residential solar system installed last year and leaned on Andrew Wright and the RGS Energy team for guidance through the process. They ended up very happy with how the array performs and with the continued support the crew provided after the sale. The detail that stuck with them was Andrew (Andy) and his team's hands‑on, responsive follow‑through even once the installation was complete.

3. Randy Ramos
Google | Oct 16, 2017 |

Randy invested about $35,000 cash to put a 33-panel solar system with individual micro-inverters on one of his ranch-style homes, paying extra so he could monitor each panel’s production online. He expected per-panel monitoring but the micro-inverter system never worked, and he spent several years being bounced around—transferred or referred inside the company, left with unanswered calls and emails, and given repeated delays while RGS claimed it had to “follow up” with others. Eventually he learned the monitoring “brain,” the Envoy, was defective from the start and had been installed into a GFI-protected outlet—a practice the Envoy documentation warns against. Customer support representative Jeannette Berry delivered RGS Energy’s final stance: they would not replace the defective Envoy, and he would have to buy a replacement from the Envoy maker for nearly $400 because the problem fell outside a two-year warranty arrangement. RGS also denied that their installers’ use of a GFI outlet caused the damage, despite the warnings in the Envoy materials. Frustrated, he plans to file a complaint with the BBB and pursue the matter in civil court. The detail that sticks: after paying $35,000,

02

1. bonita
SolarReviews | Apr 19, 2017 |

Bonita attended an RGS Energy meeting in September 2014 in Great Barrington, Mass., and almost immediately moved forward with buying solar panels for her all-electric house to capture the government subsidies and collect S-REC payments available then. She chose purchase over a lease because she wanted the incentives and lower long-term costs, and the installation was completed on schedule and handled professionally. After the system went live she encountered a few issues with the Enphase equipment, but when she called the Colorado support team Andrew and Brian stepped in and resolved the problems quickly; she found them gracious, knowledgeable and even enjoyable to talk with. The result has been dramatic: last year her electric bill was $74. What lingers from her experience is the combination of a clean, timely installation plus hands-on, friendly support that translated into real savings.

2. Lizzie
SolarReviews | Aug 7, 2016 |

Lizzie had solar panels fitted to her barn roof just over a year ago and watched the installation proceed on schedule, with staff who were friendly and accommodating throughout. That first winter she saw only minimal bills, and after a full year the system delivered zero electric charges despite Vermont’s tough weather. The clearest takeaway: a neatly executed installation on a barn that paid off with no utility bills after twelve months.

3. Natalya L
SolarReviews | Aug 30, 2017 |

Natalya L discovered that, a year after buying a nearly $10,000 residential solar system, her panels still weren’t activated. She found the installer had repeatedly failed to send the necessary paperwork to Excel Energy, which kept activation from moving forward. She paid in full, tried repeatedly to get the company to fix the gap, and encountered rudeness and refusals to resolve the problem; calls went unanswered. The outcome: nearly $10,000 spent and a nonworking system because the interconnection paperwork was never delivered. Her clear takeaway was to insist the installer files and the utility accepts the interconnection documents before handing over payment.

03

1. Early Adopter
SolarReviews | Aug 8, 2016 |

Early Adopter installed a ground-mounted solar array in 2009 and, over the years, discovered it consistently produced more energy than the original estimates. When one panel later shattered (cause unknown), the company moved quickly — the warranty visit was prompt and handled the replacement professionally. After nearly two decades the system's steady above‑expectation output plus that fast, fuss‑free warranty response is the detail that sticks: long-term performance backed by responsive service.

2. Pro
SolarReviews | Jun 26, 2016 |

Pro bought a rooftop system from RGS expecting it to cover about 85% of their home's energy needs. After the first year they discovered it produced 110% of household consumption — a figure that already accounted for running the air conditioning for the equivalent of a full month during summer. They ended up with a system that not only met projections but exceeded them, leaving them clearly satisfied. The standout detail: first-year output beat expectations by a wide margin, producing more energy than the household used even with heavy cooling.

3. Alex K
SolarReviews | Aug 21, 2017 |

Alex K bought a brand-new house a year ago that came with the company's solar panels, paying $9,300 for the system. A year later they discovered the panels still aren't working. At first the installer came back with excuses and promised to address the problem, but over time the company stopped answering their calls and became unresponsive. The striking takeaway is simple and concrete: $9,300 paid for a nonfunctional solar setup and a year of silence from the installer.

Long-term Satisfaction

Long-term satisfaction for RGS Energy drops to 3.9 ★ compared to early reviews. This is better than 57% of installers we looked at.

Long-term reviews carry the most weight in our methodology because they are most representative of what you should be paying for: a system that will perform for years.

Top Solar Installers Nationwide