Score
Shine Solar reviews
• updated MAR 3, 2026Loading map...
The Verdict
Shine Solar isn't worth the risk. We analyzed thousands of reviews and found a company that delivers solid installations when things go right, but leaves customers stranded when systems underperform or fail. One homeowner watched their steel shop building collapse under ice buildup two months after installation, then spent a year fighting for a reinstall and still paid $600 extra for damaged parts. Another discovered their 7-kilowatt system never produced more than 5 kilowatts, then got stonewalled when they called for answers. The pattern is clear: 645 reviews mention strong workmanship during installation, but 222 reviewers report serious value problems, most tied to systems that don't generate the promised power or companies that vanish after you've paid. In 49 reviews describing total system failures, only one mentioned a satisfactory resolution. When your panels go dark or your bills stay high, you'll spend weeks trying to reach anyone. (One customer waited two weeks just to schedule a repair, then the technician left his impact tool on the roof.) If you want panels that actually deliver the savings you were promised, and a company that picks up the phone when they don't, keep looking.
If you're hoping to lock in predictable electric bills, Shine Solar's track record suggests you'll end up paying both your loan and your utility. The installation crews are competent, but the moment your system underperforms, you're on your own.
3 Stories That Stood Out
Tyler H. pursued a solar install in 2020: a 22-panel array on his long-standing steel shop and two new HVAC systems for his house. The crew finished the roof work in late summer and everything seemed fine until a late-October winter storm piled heavy ice onto the panels, and the shop’s steel roof collapsed to a total loss within months of the install. He blames Shine Solar for picking that building and sending engineers who cleared it as suitable, while the company denied responsibility. Grateful the failure didn’t affect his home, he still faced a long, frustrating aftermath. It took nearly a year before the panels went back up on a rebuilt shop; follow-up communication and support dragged out, and his request to convert the system to a ground mount drew a quote for “several thousand dollars” despite the large payment he’d already made for the original install and the separate cost to rebuild the shop. In the end he also paid about $600 out of pocket to replace bent and broken parts just to get the array reinstalled. He walked away feeling the process was mishandled and warns others by pointing to the collapsed roof, the slow response, and the extra out-of-pocket charges as the tr
Don B had a residential solar array put in about a year and a half ago and discovered it never reached the 7.03 kW peak output the installer promised. The company that monitors the system consistently recorded a top output of roughly 5.04 kW, well short of the contracted performance. He raised the discrepancy with Shine Solar and encountered slow responses and what he felt was gaslighting; when someone did answer, the suggestion was to buy more panels rather than investigate why the system underperformed. That left him paying for an expensive system that did not meet the performance he signed up for, a gap he views as a breach of contract. Frustration mounted after a repair visit when a technician left an impact tool on the roof; it took almost two weeks to get anyone on the phone to retrieve it and schedule the follow-up. The technician eventually returned and the issue was resolved, which is the only reason he awarded two stars instead of one. The detail that lingers: the monitoring logs showed about 5.04 kW versus the promised 7.03 kW, and the company’s immediate fix was to propose more panels rather than address the shortfall.
Jemima M signed on with Shine Solar in Rogers, AR expecting a home system that would slash her bills — she was promised months with $0 or $20 statements and told the company would add panels if the system didn’t deliver. For the first few months she saw the savings she had been sold, then the bills climbed: she began routinely paying over $100, then hit $296 one month and $393 the next. When the panels went offline from the internet she fought to get anyone to answer; after finally pulling a contact number from an email she reached a technician who blamed “no sun,” and then, when she pointed out high summer bills, blamed “too much sun.” The sales pitch that extra production would be stored to cover low-sun months never materialized, and the promised panel additions after months of poor results never arrived or were even followed up on. To make matters worse, the company offered a $75 fee to reconnect the system — a charge she found galling after years of paying higher bills and getting no remedy. The clearest takeaway: after roughly two years she ended up with bigger electric bills, unresponsive service, contradictory explanations, and a reconnection fee instead of the fixes she’d»
Platforms Monitored
Performance by Work Type
How We Got To Trust Score 59
Buyer Beware
Unauthorized Activities
2 reports
Misleading Claims
21 reports
Background Check
Serving customers for 10 years
Operating longer than most installers in the market.
BBB Rating: C
Poor BBB standing. Significant complaints.
Natural Review Patterns
Reviews were posted naturally over time.
What You Can Expect
B&L Outdoors hired Shine Solar and found the team refreshingly upfront and honest from the start. They experienced professional, clear communication through the process, and after living with the system for two years they remain very satisfied with how it performs. The standout detail: the company’s upfront approach matched the long-term outcome, leaving them confident in their choice.
Brady T. wavered between four and five stars and ultimately landed on five. He and his wife had already done a lot of homework and rushed the salesperson through the usual pitch, then moved quickly to signing electronic documents and getting the process started. He encountered a sales and customer-service team that answered questions promptly and stayed on top of the file, which kept things moving smoothly at the front end. After that, the pace slowed: a roof and electrical-box visit arrived a couple of weeks later, an aerial drone scan took another week, and then several weeks of behind-the-scenes work for city permitting and the utility agreement followed. The crew installed the panels within roughly three months of first contact, but the system couldn’t be energized for about six weeks while waiting on the final city inspection and the utility to install the special meter. His customer-service rep had warned that activation typically takes two to four weeks, so the extended wait was frustrating but not a surprise. The standout of the experience was the attentive sales and support staff who answered questions and managed expectations; the practical takeaway he passes along is to/
Marion W had Shine Solar install a rooftop system in Rogers, Arkansas at the end of 2021 for nearly $30,000. She later discovered the company went out of business, leaving her with no one to call for repairs or maintenance. Marion also felt misled by a salesperson named Harrison, who came to her home even though the company operated as a phone-sales business; she ended up with what she describes as a poor-quality system and an unfavorable interest rate. Now trying to pursue a complaint, she’s left holding a costly system without warranty support or service.
Adrienna had solar panels installed in 2017 and the installation went smoothly at first. After a tornado last year the array stopped producing and stopped communicating with her electric company’s setup. The company reached out on Facebook and messaged her, then they had a phone call during which the installer promised to resolve the problem and to email steps to fix it — but the email never arrived and their Facebook page either disappeared or blocked her access. She has called repeatedly and had technicians come out multiple times, yet the system still won’t connect or produce. The panels now sit on the roof unused, and even though the system remains within the service periods the company hasn’t delivered a reliable repair. Frustrated, she plans to report the issue to the BBB if it isn’t handled soon; the image that sticks is a nonworking system under warranty and a company that engaged briefly on social media only to vanish before making good on its promises.
Michael Valdez installed solar a little over a year ago and found it has delivered exactly what he expected. He walked through a smooth, problem‑free installation and discovered that on hot, sunny days the system covers all of his home’s electricity needs while banking excess generation back to the grid. The clear takeaway: consistent, dependable production that not only powers the house but produces surplus when the sun is strong.
Don B had a residential solar array put in about a year and a half ago and discovered it never reached the 7.03 kW peak output the installer promised. The company that monitors the system consistently recorded a top output of roughly 5.04 kW, well short of the contracted performance. He raised the discrepancy with Shine Solar and encountered slow responses and what he felt was gaslighting; when someone did answer, the suggestion was to buy more panels rather than investigate why the system underperformed. That left him paying for an expensive system that did not meet the performance he signed up for, a gap he views as a breach of contract. Frustration mounted after a repair visit when a technician left an impact tool on the roof; it took almost two weeks to get anyone on the phone to retrieve it and schedule the follow-up. The technician eventually returned and the issue was resolved, which is the only reason he awarded two stars instead of one. The detail that lingers: the monitoring logs showed about 5.04 kW versus the promised 7.03 kW, and the company’s immediate fix was to propose more panels rather than address the shortfall.
Ali D. approached solar skeptically but, after digging into options, found Shine Solar and went ahead with a residential system a little over five years ago. They discovered their electric bills shrank to just a fraction of what they used to pay, and the monthly loan payments have matched those savings for years. Now in their late 40s, they expect to enjoy the payoff for decades: the system will be paid off in about two years, at which point the savings will convert into clear net benefit. They would hire Shine Solar again without hesitation — the concrete math of matched payments and an imminent payoff is what stuck with them.
Coy Holmes has been a Shine customer for two years and hasn’t experienced a single negative interaction. Over that time he discovered a steady, long-term commitment from the company—more than a one-off installation, Shine stayed involved and dependable well after setup. That uninterrupted reliability is the memorable part of his experience: two years in, he still trusts them to be around for the future needs of his home’s solar system.
Melissa had solar panels and a combined HVAC system installed on her home about two years ago and expected lower utility bills. Instead she discovered essentially zero savings — the panels produce far less than promised, not even half of the output she was led to expect. The HVAC worked for a while but then began failing component after component, leaving her with repeated breakdowns. Attempts to get help turned into silence: most calls went unanswered, and on the one occasion the company answered she was told they would not send technicians to make repairs. She ended up having to hire other AC companies for fixes, and now sees both Shine Solar and Shine Air as a waste of money and time. The lasting image is clear: underperforming panels, an unreliable air system, and an installer that won’t service what it sold — leaving her with ongoing bills and out-of-pocket repairs.
Long-term Satisfaction
Long-term satisfaction for Shine Solar drops to 2.5 ★ compared to early reviews. This decline is worse than 75% of installers we looked at.
Long-term reviews carry the most weight in our methodology because they are most representative of what you should be paying for: a system that will perform for years.