SolarCraft reviews
• last updated FEB 26, 2026Loading map...
The Verdict
SolarCraft handles the basics well but doesn't deliver the standout experience you'll find at top-tier installers. We found a company where individual salespeople shine (Robert Arnold earned mentions in 50 reviews for accurate sizing and realistic timelines) but the operational backbone shows cracks. One reviewer waited six months from signing to activation, triple the promised timeframe, while their entire home renovation stalled because SolarCraft delayed a panel upgrade that should have happened immediately. Another discovered that claiming a 25-year panel warranty meant paying SolarCraft up to $2,000 for testing with no guarantee of a favorable outcome. The workmanship itself scored a 4.7, anchored by installers who ran clean conduit and delivered systems that perform as promised. In 25 reviews about post-installation issues, technicians resolved equipment failures quickly and often at no charge. But project management earned mixed marks: 101 positive mentions against 18 complaints about missed schedules and serial handoffs between project managers. If you value local expertise and can stomach the occasional coordination fumble, SolarCraft's employee-owned model and multi-decade track record in the North Bay make it a defensible choice. Just don't expect the white-glove reliability that defines premium installers.
If you're willing to manage timelines yourself and push for updates when things go quiet, SolarCraft's quality work and responsive repair team justify the choice. But if your project has moving parts that depend on the installer hitting deadlines, look elsewhere.
Reviews That Shaped Our Verdict
Andrew T. signed a purchase in May for a complete solar design-and-build on a house that was being fully renovated, and ended up waiting six months before the system went live — missing the entire summer of solar generation and only getting activated in mid-November. He had chosen SolarCraft because his roofing contractor recommended them and promised coordinated work, but the project stalled and his renovation sat open while electrical and roofing tasks waited for the solar team to move. The contract promised a 4–10 week build plus interconnection approvals, yet interconnection clearance took just six days while the company’s internal sequencing stretched the job out for months. A main panel upgrade that could have been done shortly after signing instead didn’t happen until October; once the panel crew was engaged, PG&E needed about a month to schedule a power shutoff, but SolarCraft hadn’t pushed earlier to avoid that bottleneck. Communication and project management broke down repeatedly: he got passed between two project managers, had to chase both SolarCraft and the roofers because they weren’t coordinating, and watched crews treat steps as strictly serial when some could have,
Maria R. had a photovoltaic system put on her home in 2003 for about $28,000 and expected the panels to follow the typical 0.5–1% annual degradation (roughly 15% over the lifetime). Instead, one panel failed after only a few years and was swapped for a different, inferior brand, and the whole array has lost roughly 70% of its performance to date. When she pressed SolarCraft to honor the original 25‑year warranty she had been led to expect, the company pointed her to the panel maker, Sharp, and insisted the warranty was the manufacturer’s responsibility. SolarCraft then required extensive testing and measurements — work they said would take many hours and cost the customer roughly $1,000–$2,000 — to prove the panels had degraded beyond normal levels before they would pursue a claim. Faced with the practical impossibility of producing those measurements and no guarantee of a favorable outcome, she chose to replace every panel and pay SolarCraft the full replacement cost herself. Her persistent takeaway: SolarCraft limits its warranty to workmanship and expects customers to chase manufacturer guarantees, a distinction she wishes had been made clearly at installation. The detail that l
In August 2022, David L. had SolarCraft install a 20 MWh/year solar-electric system on his Marin County property. From the first site visit through design, installation, and post‑install follow-up, Robert Arnold led the project and handled the details—sizing the array, configuring the system, coordinating the crew, and staying involved after the panels were live. He and the SolarCraft team kept David regularly updated on progress so he rarely had to call; that steady communication was the defining feature of the job. They were racing to go live and formally interconnect with PG&E before changes to the net‑metering rules, and SolarCraft made sure the install finished with time to spare. Robert also flagged likely snags early on—possible delays in PG&E permitting and the remote chance PG&E would require a new transformer at David’s expense—so there were no surprises when those issues didn’t materialize. David appreciated that Robert set realistic expectations from the start, a practice he found notably uncommon among contractors. David put the project in the broader context of PG&E and CPUC moves to trim some solar incentives, but noted that, with electricity prices climbing, the
Platforms Monitored
Performance by Work Type
How We Got To Trust Score 86
No Red Flags
Unauthorized Activities
Passed screening
Misleading Claims
Passed screening
Background Check
Serving customers for 16 years
Among the longest-standing installers in the market.
BBB Rating: A+
Excellent BBB standing. Strong complaint resolution.
Natural Review Patterns
Reviews were posted naturally over time.
Licensed Contractor
A valid contractor license is on record.
What You Can Expect
Marilyn G. moved quickly to add mini-splits to a small rental cottage so she could lock in a tax credit that disappears after 2025. Two years earlier she had SolarCraft install solar panels on the same property that have kept performing well, so she turned to the same team for the heat-pump work. The installers arrived competent and efficient, used quality materials, and stayed pleasant through the job; the installation wrapped up cleanly and she ended up with no regrets. The most memorable detail was the continuity — proven results from the earlier solar job made rehiring SolarCraft an easy, low-stress choice when the tax-credit deadline was looming. She left a five-star review, and the practical takeaway for buyers is simple: reliable past performance mattered more than a pitch when timing was tight.
Stephen Marotto met with Robert Arnold at SolarCraft to explore installing solar panels and to learn about battery options for his home. Robert walked him through the costs and benefits, explained how the system would operate, and steered him toward higher-quality, safety-minded choices while answering every concern. Robert also took time to size the system precisely by carefully estimating Stephen’s electricity demand, and they ended up with a system that fits usage perfectly. He walked away pleased with the service and the value Robert delivered. More than two years after installation, he has been very happy with the system’s performance and the resulting economics: utility bills have dropped to very low levels, and the payback is tracking exactly as Robert predicted.
Stephen worked with Robert Arnold at SolarCraft to size and install a home solar system, and Robert took the time to walk him through the costs, benefits, and how batteries and the system itself operate. Robert pushed for quality and safety, answered every concern, and accurately dialed in Stephen’s electricity needs so the array ended up the right size. More than two years after installation, the system’s performance and the economics have matched those projections — utility bills are very low and the payback timeline is unfolding exactly as Robert estimated.