

Loading map...
SolarMax makes big promises but fails when you need them most. We analyzed hundreds of reviews and found a clear pattern: strong sales experience followed by a service breakdown that leaves systems down for months. In one case, a customer waited four months for a replacement inverter while owing $2,000 to the electric company, after SolarMax took weeks just to check if the part was in stock. In another, faulty panels sat bypassed with no follow-up while the homeowner called repeatedly, never getting a callback. We found 68 reviews describing recurring system failures and repair delays stretching beyond three months. Post-sale support scored just 3.7 out of 5, with 140 negative mentions, and customers report that once panels stop working, getting anyone to return a call becomes nearly impossible. The customer service team hangs up, ignores messages, or tells you they have no information for weeks on end. Several longtime customers say the company avoids warranty claims entirely, leaving 12-year-old systems broken and owners paying for both non-functioning solar and grid electricity. If you want an installer who'll still answer the phone when something breaks, this is not it.
If you value long-term support over a smooth sales pitch, avoid SolarMax. The install may go fine, but when your system fails, you'll spend months chasing callbacks and living without the savings you paid for.
Gary purchased a rooftop solar system in 2015 and enjoyed years of trouble-free service — it produced more energy than his household used and wiped out his Edison bill, prompting him to refer two friends to the same installer. In November 2022 the array began producing only sporadically, and because he monitored output daily on the company portal he knew right away when it fell to nearly nothing. Calls and voicemail messages to customer service went unanswered for weeks; after repeated attempts he finally landed a technician visit on 12/05/22, but the system worked for a day and then stopped again. Two weeks of more unanswered messages led to another appointment on 01/20/23, when a tech suspected an inverter problem and flagged it to the office. A follow-up visit on 02/13/23 uncovered two faulty panels; the tech bypassed them and said the array would run until replacements arrived, but the system failed again after a day. Frustrated, he drove to the company’s facility on 02/17/23 and found a customer-service rep who admitted they hadn’t even checked inventory for those two panels four days after the tech’s diagnosis — despite a warehouse stacked with thousands of panels. Three more
Robb had a SolarMax system on his home for nearly four years when the inverter, which had already been replaced once early on, failed again in the August heat. He spent weeks trying to book a service visit — bounced through phone tag and promises of callbacks that never came — and finally got an appointment scheduled more than three weeks out. When the technician arrived he confirmed the inverter was dead within minutes but then spent an hour on the phone to get approval to order a replacement. Robb waited without updates: calls over the next two months turned up no information about the part, and only after roughly three months did the company say the replacement had arrived and they could come back in three weeks. When they did return, the crew swapped the inverter in about 30 minutes and were polite and professional. The bottom line for Robb was that his system sat offline for about four months, his utility balance swung from a credit of roughly $400 to a $2,000 charge, and he felt like an afterthought compared with how he imagines new customers would be handled. He had previously referred three neighbors and now plans to stop recommending SolarMax; the lasting image is a quick,
Eleana T. had a SolarMax system installed 12 years ago and recently discovered the panels were failing and the inverter needed replacement — work she expected to be covered under warranty. She reached out and got initial promises that SolarMax would follow up with emails detailing options and pricing, but two months later the emails never arrived. When she called back, she often got the runaround: long holds, dropped calls, or no answer at all. Specific contacts she tried include Arianna, who never returned multiple phone calls, and Diana, who hung up on her. Talking with neighbors who had the same installer revealed the problem wasn’t isolated. As a result, she’s left paying for electricity while equipment under warranty sits unaddressed. The clearest takeaway from her experience: the company’s post-install support evaporated for older systems, and she now warns future buyers to demand clear, documented warranty-response commitments before investing.
0 reports
8 reports
Among the longest-standing installers in the market.
Good BBB standing.
Reviews were posted naturally over time.
Tom F. moved into a Redlands home four years ago and, on a neighbor’s recommendation, had SolarMax install solar panels and a battery backup. He relied on their ongoing accessibility and support over those years, so when he chose to expand the system this summer he turned back to the same team. SolarMax managed the project from design through paperwork—preparing the application, navigating the City review, completing the installation—and secured Edison’s final approval to operate. He found their responsiveness and technical competence kept the process moving smoothly and without surprises. The detail that stood out to him was continuity: the same crew who installed the original system handled the upgrade and the approvals, so the expansion felt like a seamless extension rather than a fresh, uncertain start.
In 2020 Aaron V. began getting bids for a home solar system and kept seeing $40,000-plus estimates — then a coworker recommended Dan Cooley from SolarMax. He landed on SolarMax after their quote came in around $18,000, far less than the other offers, and because the whole sales process was unusually low‑touch: Dan and the team mapped the roof with Google Maps and completed agreements via Docusign instead of a drawn‑out in‑person pitch. The system went in and, four years later in 2024, it continues to produce at the same rate with no problems. The takeaway that stuck with him was simple and concrete: a significantly cheaper, largely remote sales experience that resulted in a reliable system still performing years on.
On a residential solar install, Christina S. discovered a kinked electrical conduit after the system was in place and sent SolarMax an onsite photo (Update #4) the moment she became aware. She volunteered to cover any correction she hadn’t known was needed and approached the company looking for a fix. Instead, SolarMax declared the conduit had been tampered with by another contractor, refused to work with her to resolve it, and voided the contract. What frustrated her most was that several SolarMax technicians had been to the house to repair split wiring—work she believes was not up to code—and at no point did any of them identify or report the kink. She emphasizes that the original installer is responsible for ensuring equipment meets code, and she was left with a safety/code issue that the company declined to correct after blaming third-party tampering.
Paul arranged for solar panels to be installed more than 11 years ago and watched the whole process go smoothly — careful, top‑notch work from start to finish. Over the ensuing decade the system’s power output stayed steady. When a small problem, one he had caused, appeared, the company turned up promptly and courteously to make it right. What stood out was their willingness to stand behind their work even after many years — a quick, professional response that left him very satisfied.
Kevin, a Realtor in South Orange County who lives in Rancho Santa Margarita with his wife Julie and their three boys, connected with Brandon Mezzanato at Solar Max when he decided to go solar. From the first meeting Brandon walked him through the whole process in plain language, set realistic expectations and then exceeded them, patiently answering every question and shaping a system aimed to break even or deliver a small positive return each year. Fourteen months after the system went live he ended the year with a credit on his Southern California Edison bill that rolled forward into the next year — a tangible sign the design worked. Because he leased the array, he also locked in a fixed monthly payment for 25 years that turned out to be meaningfully lower than his pre-solar bills, and he now feels better positioned to absorb future electricity price increases. Beyond the numbers, the standout detail is Brandon’s ongoing availability: more than a year later Kevin can still pick up the phone, reach Brandon directly and be greeted by name when complex billing questions come up. He also appreciated that Solar Max is a local Riverside company that manufactures its own panels in a 165,
John installed a system on a small two-person home expecting a noticeable cut in his power bills, but after installation he still pays roughly $100–$130 a month plus the solar payments. When a single panel stopped producing, Solar Max sent a technician out promptly to troubleshoot — that quick service started off well. After the visit, however, the experience unraveled: for two months he pushed for a replacement and met a stream of excuses. The panel remained in place so the manufacturer had nothing to inspect, warranty approval dragged on for a month, then Solar Max said the manufacturer needed to ship the replacement to them, creating another delay. Meanwhile his electric bill stayed high, and he began to doubt that Solar Max keeps spare panels locally. He recently inquired about upgrading the system but decided against any further work with Solar Max because of the slow warranty process. Reading BBB complaints that reflected the same delays reinforced his reluctance; the concrete takeaway he kept in mind was that a prompt diagnostic visit didn’t prevent months without a working panel and continued high bills.
Aaron bought a 28-panel solar system from SolarMax about six to seven years ago; the sales rep moved quickly, answered questions, and the array produced roughly 3–4 kWh per hour at peak. About a year ago he opted to add a 20 kWh battery backup and asked about more panels. SolarMax advised adding only three panels to avoid being pushed into NEM3.0 — a piece of local SCE know-how he appreciated — but that decision marked the turning point where the experience began to fray. What followed were a string of small but frustrating issues. An installation window slipped from an initial two months to three or four. The field techs were personable and willing to explain technical details, but they left some clamps behind. The crew that came to inspect and paint accidentally spilled paint on the concrete and didn’t mention it; he eventually removed the dried stain with a pressure washer. The biggest problem emerged after commissioning: the batteries barely charged and the companion app reported confusing information. He discovered a widespread equipment bug that affected charging; technicians corrected it, but he lost out on generated kWh and dollars while it was unresolved. Even under best
Paul W. has lived with this company's solar installation on his home for twelve years and gave it a five-star review. Over that span he found the equipment still performing reliably, and whenever a small issue came up the company moved quickly to fix it. The lasting impression: durable gear plus fast, responsive service for the little problems that do occur.
Carl Terzian found himself with loose wiring at his home after the crew unhooked connections to his pre-existing Generac standby generator. When he asked the company to return and reattach the cables, they refused. What began as decisions framed to “save money” quickly felt like moves that served the company’s interests rather than his — and the disconnected generator wiring is only one of several problems he’s experienced. He plans to upload photos of the loose, unconnected wiring to document the issue, leaving the lingering image of a standby generator left unusable by the installer’s choices.
Long-term satisfaction for SolarMax Technology drops to 3.3 ★ compared to early reviews. This decline is worse than 71% of installers we looked at.
Long-term reviews carry the most weight in our methodology because they are most representative of what you should be paying for: a system that will perform for years.