Auxin Solar reviews
• last updated FEB 26, 2026Loading map...
The Verdict
Auxin Solar is not a residential installer. We found dozens of reviews, but nearly all are either vague cheerleading or complaints about the company's manufacturing operations and business practices, not actual home solar installations. One installer reported panels developing microcracks in 80% of an array after a decade, plus junction box delamination on another system in the same timeframe. Another freight partner says the company won't return calls about unpaid invoices. The negative signals cluster around product durability (8 mentions) and business conduct, not installation quality, because this company manufactures panels rather than putting them on your roof. If you're researching solar contractors, you're looking at the wrong listing. (And if you were buying panels wholesale, the pattern here would still send you elsewhere.)
If you need a solar installer, this is not one. Auxin Solar manufactures panels. The reviews we analyzed discuss manufacturing quality and trade disputes, not residential installation experiences.
Reviews That Shaped Our Verdict
Kevin C. discovered he hasn't been paid for freight invoices and can't get the matter resolved. He has outstanding freight bills and Anna has not returned his calls, leaving the issue open and unanswered. The memorable detail for anyone considering this company: unpaid freight invoices paired with an unresponsive contact named Anna.
Jigme Urgyen Oḍḍiyāna installed Auxin solar modules in a couple of systems in Nepal that have been running for roughly 10–15 years. He found the oldest array ended up with microcracks in the cells beneath the laminate — about 80% of the modules showed those cracks, and though they still produced power the damage was widespread. On another system, after roughly 10 years the junction box began to delaminate from the back of the panel. He observed other systems at the same location, installed the same way but using different modules, that showed no defects. The clear takeaway: after a decade-plus the Auxin panels exhibited extensive microcracking and a peeling J‑box while neighboring arrays remained defect-free.
Four years ago Sean Monaghan tried to have Auxin Solar OEM or white‑label panels for his company, and what began as an exploratory conversation stretched into four months of slow email exchanges because management took weeks to reply — the last response even arrived mostly in Chinese. When PEP Solar demanded a third‑party audit covering raw materials, warranty piles and accounting that would show how many panels were actually being produced, Auxin Solar went dark. He concluded that the company couldn’t demonstrate Tier‑1 status or, in his view, even that it was reliably manufacturing product. Later he received a rumor from a protected source alleging Auxin was being backed by utility and oil‑and‑gas interests to undercut the solar industry; he didn’t embrace conspiracy, but the claim amplified his unease. He found the whole interaction disturbing, especially given Auxin Solar’s involvement, and doubted the company could supply the roughly 4 GW of panels the U.S. market needs right now. He also noted that any U.S. bank asked to finance such an expansion would first want to inspect Auxin’s books — a hurdle he implied wouldn’t be cleared. The detail that lingers: an unanswered audit请求
Platforms Monitored
Performance by Work Type
How We Got To Trust Score 38
Clean Record
Unauthorized Activities
Passed screening
Misleading Claims
Passed screening
Background Check
Serving customers for 8 years
BBB Rating
Not BBB rated.
Unnatural Review Patterns
Some periods had unusually high review activity.
Contractor License
License information could not be confirmed.
What You Can Expect
Kevin C. discovered he hasn't been paid for freight invoices and can't get the matter resolved. He has outstanding freight bills and Anna has not returned his calls, leaving the issue open and unanswered. The memorable detail for anyone considering this company: unpaid freight invoices paired with an unresponsive contact named Anna.
Four years ago Sean Monaghan tried to have Auxin Solar OEM or white‑label panels for his company, and what began as an exploratory conversation stretched into four months of slow email exchanges because management took weeks to reply — the last response even arrived mostly in Chinese. When PEP Solar demanded a third‑party audit covering raw materials, warranty piles and accounting that would show how many panels were actually being produced, Auxin Solar went dark. He concluded that the company couldn’t demonstrate Tier‑1 status or, in his view, even that it was reliably manufacturing product. Later he received a rumor from a protected source alleging Auxin was being backed by utility and oil‑and‑gas interests to undercut the solar industry; he didn’t embrace conspiracy, but the claim amplified his unease. He found the whole interaction disturbing, especially given Auxin Solar’s involvement, and doubted the company could supply the roughly 4 GW of panels the U.S. market needs right now. He also noted that any U.S. bank asked to finance such an expansion would first want to inspect Auxin’s books — a hurdle he implied wouldn’t be cleared. The detail that lingers: an unanswered audit请求