

Loading map...
Energy Remodeling leaves broken roofs and nonworking panels behind. We analyzed dozens of reviews and found a pattern of installation failures, unpaid subcontractors, and customer-service blackouts. One homeowner has called 20 times over two years to fix a documented roof leak; the company claims she can't prove they caused it. Another paid $30,000 upfront only to discover the true financed cost will hit $90,000, plus the company slapped a lien on their house. The math gets worse: 15 reviewers flagged poor value, 12 described post-sale support that vanishes the moment you need it, and 11 complained about sales reps who misrepresent government programs and pressure 91-year-olds into deals. Subcontractors report $10,000 in unpaid invoices and warn the company hops between names and addresses to dodge complaints. One reviewer even said the installer forced customers to post fake positive reviews. If you want solar that actually turns on and a company that answers the phone when it leaks, keep looking.
If you're considering Energy Remodeling, reconsider. The pattern is clear: botched installs, unresponsive service, and financial surprises that triple your cost. Choose a company with a track record of fixing what they break.
Matt S. hired the company to put a residential solar array on his roof and soon discovered the roof leaking into the house after the install. He had a roofer inspect and document that the leak resulted from the installation, but despite more than 20 phone calls over two years the installer refused to take responsibility or repair the damage. He ended up living with unresolved water damage while the company declined to act, leaving the clearest takeaway for buyers: documented evidence and persistent calls did not force a remedy in this case, so demand clear post-installation accountability before signing.
Irene S. hired the company for what she understood to be a $30,000 solar installation and soon discovered multiple problems. She found the crew using what she judged to be inferior materials, then realized the finances blew up — the project that started at $30,000 would end up costing her about $90,000 before it was paid off. The situation escalated further when the company placed a lien on her house. She walked away frustrated, and the most striking detail for future buyers is this: the relationship culminated in a lien on her home.
After his company finished work, Austin A. discovered the client still owed $10,000. He dug into the business and found Rami Vildorf listed as the RMO, while the firm's names and locations seemed to shift frequently. He noticed the contractor license now shows an exempt status for workers' compensation and lists zero employees — a strange mismatch with the company's website, NRGremodeling.com, which advertises seven locations. Frustrated, he filed a complaint with the Contractors State License Board; roughly three CSLB complaints now appear tied to Vildorf, including the one he just submitted. The detail that will stick with a prospective buyer: a business advertising multiple locations while its license shows no employees and an exemption for workers' comp raised red flags and left his company $10K unpaid.
Passed screening
Passed screening
Operating longer than most installers in the market.
Poor BBB standing. Significant complaints.
Janice purchased an expensive solar package for the couple’s 15-year family home, and after the installers left she discovered the company had vanished. She and her husband could not reach anyone by phone and received no callbacks, so they drove to three listed business addresses looking for answers. At the last known Concord, CA location a security guard told them the firm had been “Evicted” for nonpayment of rent and speculated it may have folded and re-emerged under a new name; he added that other people had come asking about the company as well. Left without recourse, the couple concluded they had been defrauded: the overpriced system left them with a stark choice between bankruptcy or selling the home. They chose to sell, surrendering much of the profit they’d expected after 15 years in the property. Janice also alleges civil rights violations and elder abuse in how the sale and financing unfolded. Now she’s trying to locate whoever is operating under the old name and is organizing with others for possible legal action — she’s actively seeking anyone with information and representation for a class-action.
Irene S. hired the company for what she understood to be a $30,000 solar installation and soon discovered multiple problems. She found the crew using what she judged to be inferior materials, then realized the finances blew up — the project that started at $30,000 would end up costing her about $90,000 before it was paid off. The situation escalated further when the company placed a lien on her house. She walked away frustrated, and the most striking detail for future buyers is this: the relationship culminated in a lien on her home.
Conor O. went into a solar install last summer and ended up with a 60 sq ft hole cut in his roof — done over his objections — that remained unrepaired for more than nine months. He pushed the company for a fix and even threatened legal action, but they refused to settle, so he filed a claim with the California Contractors State License Board hoping that going after the contractor’s license will force payment for the damage. Frustrated, he also pointed other homeowners to file complaints with the CSLB (http://www.cslb.ca.gov/Consumers/Filing_A_Complaint/) and the Better Business Bureau (https://www.bbb.org/consumer-complaints/file-a-complaint/get-started) if they run into noncooperation. He warns potential customers to keep looking for a contractor: in his experience the company showed poor project management, bad customer service, and a tendency to dodge responsibility and cut corners. The detail that sticks is the unrepaired, large roof opening left for months and his ongoing CSLB claim to resolve it.
Recent customers rate Energy Remodeling 1.9 ★
Long-term reviews carry the most weight in our methodology because they are most representative of what you should be paying for: a system that will perform for years.